Editor's Notes: Freedom Means You Don't Know How People Will Vote

Polls are the only things worth looking at for gauging where things stand with elections, and they are not very good.

Editor's Notes: Freedom Means You Don't Know How People Will Vote

I am anxious about the midterms.

I know that I am not alone. If you're reading this, you are very likely in the same boat.

Odds are you're reading or watching or listening to horse race coverage, indeed you probably did so today. Perhaps you've followed election forecasters like Nate Silver or G. Elliott Morris closely.

It's futile. Consider: even if they are correct, you will not know they are correct until we actually know the outcome, at which point whether or not they were correct becomes irrelevant.

There's no shortcut to election day, to the final tallying of votes. In the video above, I discuss the range of possibilities given very minimal assumptions at polling error. I'll break it down more below, but the bottom line is that the uncertainty is not something any analysis can do away with.

But it can help us understand the stakes more concretely. I can't promise that will make you feel any better.

Please consider redeeming our subscriber drive deal to continue reading this Editor's Note, to support the work that we do, and to subscribe to the print edition of The Reconstruction Papers.

Redeem Offer

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Liberal Currents.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.